METHODOLOGIES FOR STERILIZATION OF RENAL SCAFFOLDS: A MINI-LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

  • Ana Laura Ferreira Rios Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7145-2353 (unauthenticated)
  • Luiz Gustavo Nascimento Dorvigens Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Mickael Breno de Godoi Sousa Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Antonio Moraes Farias Neto Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA
  • João Pedro Ribeiro Afonso Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Luís Vicente Franco de Oliveira Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA

Keywords:

scaffold renal; esterilização; dióxido de carbono supercrítico; ácido peracético.

Abstract

Introduction: Tissue bioengineering is advancing in the creation of viable scaffolds for applications with various cell types. However, one of the biggest challenges for the clinical use of these biomaterials is the sterilization step. After the decellularization process, the resulting scaffold must be completely sterile. The method used must eliminate all microbial contaminants without compromising the delicate structure and biological components of the matrix, which would render its therapeutic application unfeasible. Objective: To evaluate the main sterilization methods for renal scaffolds for clinical use. Methods: Using the PICO strategy, the guiding question was determined, and articles were searched for in the search engines PubMed Central (PubMed), Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Sciello, using the appropriate descriptors according to DECS/MesH. Thirteen articles were selected for this integrative review. Results: Conventional methods such as gamma irradiation and autoclaving, while effective, severely compromise the structural and biological integrity of the scaffold, making them unsuitable. Ethylene oxide (ETO) emerges as a less destructive alternative, but its inherent risk of residual cytotoxicity limits its application. In this context, peracetic acid (PAA), when used under optimized conditions, represents the most balanced approach, ensuring sterility with minimal damage to the matrix and promoting a robust cellular response. Conclusion: The choice of sterilization method directly impacts the viability of ECM scaffolds. However, traditional methodologies are not suitable for highly sensitive biomaterials such as kidney tissue, necessitating new techniques that, while effective, require further testing.

References

HUSSAIN, K. et al. A Review of Decellularization and Sterilization Methods for Developing a Bio-Scaffold for Kidney Tissue Engineering. International Journal of Biomaterials, [S.l.], v. 2022, p. 1-14, 2022. ID 9018074.

KAUR, H. et al. Sterilization of decellularized kidney scaffolds: a comparative study. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, [S.l.], v. 38, n. 6, p. 1528-1538, 2023.

LÓPEZ-GARCÍA, S. et al. Sterilization of silk fibroin scaffolds for tissue engineering: a review. Biomedical Materials, [S.l.], v. 18, n. 2, 2023. ID 022002.

LU, H. et al. Bioinks and Advanced Biomanufacturing of Living Tissues and Organs. Advanced Science, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 15, 2020. ID 1901198.

PAEZ-MAYORGA, J. et al. A multi-organ decellularized human tissue matrix resource for tissue engineering. Scientific Data, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 620, 2022.

POKIDYSHEVA, E. N. et al. Sterilization of acellular tissue matrix using supercritical carbon dioxide. Translational Andrology and Urology, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 6, p. 896-906, 2022.

QI, Y. et al. Sterilization of porcine acellular dermal matrix by ethylene oxide, gamma irradiation, and electron beam irradiation. Cell and Tissue Banking, [S.l.], v. 22, n. 4, p. 797-807, 2021.

RODRÍGUEZ-LÁZARO, S. et al. Impact of Sterilization on the Physicochemical Properties of Collagen-Based Scaffolds. Materials, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 5, p. 1935, 2022.

SACK, B. et al. Challenges in the Translation of Decellularized Tissues and Their Derivatives. Advanced Science, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 1, 2022. ID 2103526.

SOUZA, A. C. S. et al. Descelularização de rins suínos para obtenção de arcabouço extracelular com potencial de utilização em bioengenharia tecidual. Brazilian Journal of Technology, Curitiba, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1-13, 2016. DOI: 10.53855/bjt.v19i4.118

TANTISATTAMO, E.; MAGGIORE, U.; PICCOLI, G. B. History of kidney transplantation: a journey of progression and evolution for success. Journal of Nephrology, [S.l.], v. 35, p. 1783–1786, 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01453-3.

TEODORO, J. S. et al. Sterilization of natural-derived biomaterials: An overview. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 1184408, 2023.

VARALAKSHMI, K. N. et al. A Review on Sterilization Methods of Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering. International Journal of Biomaterials, [S.l.], v. 2022, p. 1-11, 2022. ID 2220641.

WHITE, L. J. et al. Sterilization of decellularized extracellular matrix: A review. Biomaterials and Biosystems, [S.l.], v. 1, p. 100053, 2021.

Published

2026-02-03

Issue

Section

RESUMO EXPANDIDO "SAÚDE" - exclusivo Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica/2024-2025

How to Cite

METHODOLOGIES FOR STERILIZATION OF RENAL SCAFFOLDS: A MINI-LITERATURE REVIEW. (2026). CIPEEX. https://anais.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/CIPEEX/article/view/15102