THE MANIPULATION OF ALGORITHMS AS AN ILLEGAL COMPETITIVE PRACTICE

Authors

  • Matheus Filipe Arruda Davi Universidade Evangélica de Goiás- UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Wictor Guilherme Meira Melo Dos Santos Universidade Evangélica de Goiás- UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Anna Laura Gabiatti Bueno Universidade Evangélica de Goiás- UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Rudd Gulit Campos Teles Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Goiás image/svg+xml

Keywords:

unfair competition, black box algorithms, digital law

Abstract

This study analyzes the protection of free competition and economic order in the face of the challenges posed by the digital age, focusing on the issue of algorithmic unfair competition. It argues that the automation and opacity of artificial intelligence systems have resulted in a new and covert form of illegality, creating an undue competitive advantage that refers to the invisibility and difficulty of attribution represented by the metaphor of the “black box algorithm.” The paper explores how the legal system, especially the Industrial Property Law (Law No. 9,279/96) and the Law on Crimes Against the Economic Order (Law No. 8,137/90), has gaps in adequately classifying and curbing these new behaviors. It demonstrates that case law, despite already debating the liability of platforms (Themes 987 and 533 of the STF), has not yet made decisive progress on algorithmic manipulation, largely due to the limits of criminal classification and the complex difficulty of proving it. It analyzes the challenge of proving intent and the insufficiency of current criminal classifications. It concludes that overcoming this evidentiary barrier and creating specific legislation—which criminalizes anti-competitive manipulation and regulates high-impact algorithms—are imperative to adapt competition law to the new times and ensure that technology is an instrument of innovation, not abuse of economic power.

References

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, 05 out. 1988.Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso:15 ago. 2025.

BRASIL. Lei nº 8.137. Brasília, 27 dez. 1990.Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9279.htm Acesso:15 ago. 2025.

BRASIL. Lei nº 9.279. Brasília, 14 mai. 1996.Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9279.htm Acesso:15 ago. 2025.

BRASIL. Lei nº 12.965. Brasília, 23 abr. 2014.Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm Acesso:15 ago. 2025.

MEYERHOF SALAMA, Bruno; BASTISTA DA SILVA DIÔGO DE LIMA, Leda. A personalização de preços na era digital: critérios para investigação concorrencial. Revista do IBRAC, [S. l.], n. 1, p. 6–29, 2023. Disponível em: https://revista.ibrac.org.br/revista/article/view/15. Acesso em: 15 ago. 2025.

PIMENTEL, José Eduardo de Souza. Inteligência artificial e algoritmos de “caixa preta”: dilemas e regulação necessária. 2021.

PRADO, Magaly. Fake news e inteligência artificial: o poder dos algoritmos na guerra da desinformação. Edições 70, 2022.

SUAVE, André Augusto. Inteligência artificial. Freitas Bastos, 2024.

Supremo Tribunal Federal. Disponível em: <https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5160549>.

Supremo Tribunal Federal. Disponível em: <https://portal.stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=5217273>.

Published

2026-01-27

Issue

Section

RESUMO EXPANDIDO "CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS E HUMANAS" - acadêmico/público geral - 2025

How to Cite

THE MANIPULATION OF ALGORITHMS AS AN ILLEGAL COMPETITIVE PRACTICE. (2026). CIPEEX. https://anais.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/CIPEEX/article/view/12752