THE JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH IN TIMES OF PANDEMICS IN THE CITY OF GOIANÉSIA

Abstract

THE SUBJECT OF THE STUDY IS ABOUT THE JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH IN TIMES OF PANDEMIC, BEING A SUBJECT OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. THE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE STUDY IS TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM ARE FACTORS THAT OCCUR NOWADAYS AND HOW SUCH OCCURRENCES CAN IMPACT JURISPRUDENCE AND THE PERFORMANCE OF THE JUDICIARY. THE GENERAL OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY IS TO OBSERVE THE JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH IN TIMES OF PANDEMIC. THE SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ARE: TO UNDERSTAND, IN THE LIGHT OF THE THEORY OF THE TRIPARTITION OF POWERS, THE JUDICIALIZATION OF POLITICS; SEARCH FOR THE CONCEPT AND ACTIONS OF JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN BRAZIL; VERIFY THE PERFORMANCE OF THE JUDICIARY IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF GOIAN�SIA. THE STUDY AIMED TO OBSERVE THE IMPACTS OF A JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH OR JUDICIAL ACTIVISM AT THE TIME OF THE PANDEMIC. THE STUDY METHODOLOGY USES AN INDUCTIVE APPROACH, THUS AIMING TO UNDERSTAND, THROUGH THE OCCURRENCES DURING THE PANDEMIC, WHAT THE CONSEQUENCES OF A JUDICIALIZATION OF HEALTH AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM IN THIS SUBJECT MAY BE. THE RESEARCH USES BIBLIOGRAPHIC AND DOCUMENTAL MATERIAL TO SUBSTANTIATE AND SUPPORT THE IDEAS. IT IS STILL BASIC RESEARCH, WITH QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE STUDY REQUIREMENTS. THE CONCLUSION OF THE STUDY IS THAT JUDICIALIZATION AND JUDICIAL ACTIVISM ARE CLEAR INTERFERENCES OF THE JUDICIARY IN ATTRIBUTIONS OF OTHER POWERS, WEAKENING THE SEPARATION OF POWERS, BUT THERE IS A PROPER ARGUMENT TO GUARANTEE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND BASIC RIGHTS IN THIS ACTIVISM, EXISTING EVEN IN GOIAN�SIA SUCH ACTIVISM AND BEING APPLIED CORRECTLY.