THE ADPF 347 AND THE SYSTEM OF PRECEDENTS

Authors

  • Liriel Macintyre de Souza Ferreira Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA
  • Aline Seabra Toschi Universidade Evangélica de Goiás - UniEVANGÉLICA

Keywords:

precedents, structural injunctions, adpf 347, stare decisis

Abstract

The present study aims to analyze the relationship between prospective temporal efficacy and the system of judicial precedents in Brazil, also addressing the techniques of overruling and distinguishing in binding precedents. To this end, the analysis will focus on the Claim of Non-Compliance with a Fundamental Precept (ADPF) 347, the Collective Habeas Corpus (HC 143.641), and structural injunctions, which aim to halt persistent and prolonged violations of fundamental rights. Subsequently, the study will examine the familiarization of the Roman-Germanic system adopted by Brazil with the institution of these decision-making mechanisms, given that they demand a sophisticated assimilation among the levels of the Judiciary to ensure their effectiveness.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): ANAIS DO CIPEEX s

Section

ANAIS DO CIPEEX s

License

These Proceedings offer free and immediate access to their content, based on the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public fosters the global democratization of knowledge.

Upon publication in the Proceedings, authors retain copyright and publication rights to their articles without restriction.

The Proceedings of the International Congress on Research, Teaching, and Extension (CIPEEX) of the Evangelical University of Goiás (UniEVANGÉLICA) adhere to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license.

How to Cite

THE ADPF 347 AND THE SYSTEM OF PRECEDENTS. (2025). CIPEEX, 5(1). https://anais.unievangelica.edu.br/index.php/CIPEEX/article/view/12038