THE BENEFITS AND DIFFICULTIES OF TELEMEDICINE AS NA ALTERNATIVE IN HEALTH ACCES: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW

Autores

  • João Marcos Faria Wanderley Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA
  • Carla Santos Bastos Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA
  • João Marcos Luiz da Silva Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA
  • Yasmim Pamella de Paula Morais Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA
  • Said Gabriel Campos Freire Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA
  • Constanza Thaise Xavier Silva Universidade Evangà©lica de Goiás - UniEVANGà‰LICA

Palavras-chave:

telemedicine, health care surveys, primary health care, healthcare access

Resumo

OBJECTIVE: TO UNDERSTAND THE BENEFITS AND DIFFICULTIES OF TELEMEDICINE AS AN ALTERNATIVE IN HEALTHCARE ACCESS. METHODS: INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF 19 ARTICLES WITH BIBLIOGRAPHIC SEARCH IN THE NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE AND NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (PUBMED), LATIN AMERICAN AND CARIBBEAN LITERATURE ON HEALTH SCIENCES (LILACS) AND COORDINATION OF SUPERIOR LEVEL STAFF IMPROVEMENT (CAPES). DESCRIPTORS USED: �€ŒTELEMEDICINE�€, �€ŒHEALTHCARE ACCESS�€, �€ŒPRIMARY HEALTH CARE�€ AND �€ŒHEALTH CARE SURVEYS�€. INCLUSION CRITERIA: ARTICLES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 2018 AND 2022 THAT ANSWERED THE GUIDING QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS AND DIFFICULTIES OF TELEMEDICINE AS AN ALTERNATIVE IN ACCESSING HEALTHCARE? RESULTS: MAIN BENEFITS: EXPANSION OF HEALTH ACCESS AND GUARANTEE OF LONGITUDINALITY AND RESOLUTION. MAIN DIFFICULTIES: SCARCE HUMAN AND STRUCTURAL RESOURCES, LOSS OF CONTACT BETWEEN DOCTOR AND PATIENT AND DIFFICULTY IN DEALING WITH TECHNOLOGICAL RESOURCES. CONCLUSION: THE USE OF TELEMEDICINE AS A TOOL TO DISSEMINATE ACCESS TO HEALTH IS VALID. HOWEVER, COLLABORATION AND TRAINING OF USERS AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ARE NECESSARY. IT IS ESSENTIAL TO DEVELOP OTHER STUDIES RELATED TO THE POSSIBILITIES THAT THIS MODALITY BRINGS.

 

KEY WORDS: TELEMEDICINE, HEALTHCARE ACCESS, PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, HEALTH CARE SURVEYS

Referências

ACKERMAN SL, et al. Comparing Patients’ Experiences with Eletronic and Traditional Consultation: Results from a multisite Survey. J Gen Intern Me, 2020; 35, 1135-1142.

ANDROGA L, et al. Telehealth versus face-to-face visits: A comprehensive outpatient perspective-based cohort study of patients with kidney disease. PLOS ONE 17(3): e0265073.

CATAPAN SC, et al. Estrutura e processo de trabalho para implantação da teleconsulta médica no Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil, um estudo transversal com dados de 2017-2018*. Epidemiol. Serv. Saude, 2021; 30(1):e2020305.

CHANG J, et al. Rapid Transition to Telehealth and the Digital Divide: Implications for Primary Care Acess and Equity in Post-COVID Era. The Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 99, No. 2, 2021 (pp. 340-368).

DAMASCENO FR, CALDEIRA PA. Teleconsultoria na atenção primária no norte de Minas Gerais: cenário e fatores associados à sua não utilização por médicos. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação Informação & Inovação em Saúde, 2018; 12(4).

DAMASCENO FR, CALDEIRA PA. Fatores associados à não utilização da teleconsultoria por médicos da Estratégia Saúde da Família. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva, 2019; 24(8).

FARR M, et al. Implementing online consultations in primary care: a mixed-method evaluation extending normalisation process theory through servisse co-production. BMJ Open, 2018; 8: e019966.

GALLE A, et al. A double-edged sword – telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed methods study of healthcare providers. BMJ Global Health 2021; 6: e004575.

GORDON NP, HORNBROOK MC. Older adults’ readiness to engage with eHealth patient education and self-care resources: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research, 2018; 18:220.

IMLACH F, et al. Telehealth consultations in general practice during a pandemic lockdown: survey and interviews on patient experiences and preferences. BMC Family Practice, 2020; 21:269.

JOHNSON C, et al. Changes to telehealth practices in primary care in New Brunswick (Canada): A comparative study pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLOS ONE, 2021; 16(11): e0258839.

KOH E, et al. Evaluation of WhatsApp as a Plataform for Teledermatology in Botswana: Retrospective Review and Survey. JMIR Dermatol, 2022;5(3):e35254.

LIAW WR, et al. Disconnected: a survey os users and nonusers of telehealth and their use of primary care. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2019, Vol 26, No. 5.

LIDDY C, et al. Sustainability of a Primary Care-Driven eConsult Service. Annals Of Family Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2018; 16:120-126.

LIDDY C, et al. Assessment of the Generalizability of na eConsult Service through Implementation in a New Health Region. J Am Board Fam Med, 2019; 32:146-157.

LIDDY C, et al. eConsults and Learning Between Primary Care Providers and Specialists. Family Medicine, 2019, Vol. 51, No. 7.

MANGIN, et al. Multimorbidity, eHealth and implications for equity: a cross-sectional survey of patient perspectives on eHealth. BMJ Open, 2019; 9: e023731.

OZGA D, et al. Use of teletransmission and influence of telemedicine on enhancing healthcare quality in opinions of paramedics from the Podkarpackie Province – a pilot survey. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2017;7(10):79-95.

SARTI TD, ALMEIDA APSC. Incorporação de telessaúde na atenção primária à saúde no Brasil e fatores associados. Caderno de Saúde Pública, 2022; 38(4): PT252221.

SENFT N, EVERSON J. eHealth Engagement as a Response to Negative Healthcare Experiences: CROSS-Sectional Survey Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2018; 20(12): e11034.

SOMERS C, et al. Valuing Mobile Health: Na Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey of a National Digital Health Program. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth , 2019; 7(1): e3.

WANNHEDEN C, et al. What’s the Name of the Game? The Impacto of Health on Productive Interactions in Chronic Care Management. Sustainability, 2021; 13,5221.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-11-30