COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY BETWEEN STRUCTURAL MASONRY AND CONVENTIONAL MASONRY

Abstract

The construction industry has adapted to significant changes, especially in Brazil during the 20th century. The search for effective solutions to improve productivity has driven the adoption of more efficient and sustainable methods in construction. Brazilian companies have prioritized savings on construction sites, facing challenges due to the persistence of outdated methods. The difference between these methods is decisive in economics, planning and waste management in construction, requiring precise planning to minimize uncertainties and guide future decisions. The elementary objective will be to make a comparison between two construction methods: structural masonry and conventional masonry with a reinforced concrete structure. This analysis will address its qualitative characteristics, advantages and disadvantages, as well as quantitative aspects, with the aim of evaluating which of the systems provides better efficiency and financial profitability. To achieve the objectives, the methodology will involve a literature review to identify the characteristics of structural masonry and conventional masonry. Next, cost, time and resource data will be collected from a reference work of 6 floors in structural masonry in Goianésia. Comparative analysis will be carried out to determine the efficiency and financial profitability of both methods. It is expected that the result of the comparison between structural masonry and conventional masonry with a reinforced concrete structure will provide clear insights into the differences between the two construction methods. This includes an in-depth understanding of the qualitative characteristics of each system, highlighting its advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore, a detailed analysis of quantitative aspects, such as construction costs, execution time and resource management, is expected to evaluate the efficiency and financial profitability of both methods. The final result should identify which system offers the best balance between construction efficiency and financial viability, assisting in decision-making for future construction projects.